In a workshop at Faculty Academy yesterday, Barbara Ganley drove home a message she had delivered with no little conviction during her plenary presentation. Borrowing a poignant phrase from E.M. Forrester (”how do I know what I think until I see what I say?”), she judiciously argued that every teacher should be modelling the process of thinking, of becoming, of deep-learning through writing. How can we use the social dynamic of a community, she poignantly asked, to encourage narrative reflection that moves through “cycles of disruption and repair”?
One of the best-kept and endemically experienced secrets in academia is that we scholar-teachers tend to fear exposure. We fear being proven wrong. We fear flopping under scrutiny. And, good heavens, we most certainly fear doing so publicly! Barbara encouraged her audience “to fail, oh, to fail gloriously and (*gasp*) in front of our students!” Why? Because failing leads to a sensation of utter disorientation and of dismay. In an exercise in the workshop, she led us to reveal to ourselves that disorientation and dismay are exactly the experiential prerequisites for deep learning, and if we are not life-long learners, how can we expect our students to be?
Some friends of mine (most notably Pedablogy and Gardner Writes), have been encouraging me to jump off the dock and say something–anything–publicly and for the record. I confess, the thought of doing so has inspired no little trepidation on my part. What could I possibly have to say that anyone at all would care to read about? To paraphrase Wodehouse’s most inimitable Jeeves, it seems a given to me that I am in real danger of generating material that would be better put aside to be read at some later date along with the gas bill.
Whether it is whimsy or courage or inspiration that wags its finger at my lesser inclinations, I am here to join the “caravan” into the company of which Gardner has aptly and with “senses variously drawn out” invited me.
May 18, 2007 at 5:59 pm
“What could I possibly have to say that anyone at all would care to read about?”
I’m afraid I can’t answer this question. I just read your first blog entry and loved it.
The entry did all of the things I love in deeply reflective blogs. You helped me experience something I wasn’t there to experience. You narrated process, and nested that narration within reflection (the hidden product in every process–and let me at it!). You spoke to yourself, to us, and to the “unmet friend.”
Horace would put it more succinctly: the post was instructive and delightful–and a speaking picture.
Welcome to the blogosphere!
May 18, 2007 at 6:00 pm
And apologies for commenting above as “Dr. C.”–the hazards of letting the browser autofill the form. :0
May 18, 2007 at 6:01 pm
Welcome! You’re off to a great start (and no gas bills in sight)!
May 18, 2007 at 6:03 pm
Ditto on what Gardner wrote….
May 18, 2007 at 6:49 pm
Well, well, well -whimsy and wonder emerge.
May 18, 2007 at 7:26 pm
Hooray!
May 18, 2007 at 7:30 pm
Yay! Now I have a good way of keeping up with you. I’m sure you’ll have lots to say.
May 18, 2007 at 9:41 pm
I also extend a welcome to you. I have had the same thoughts too, especially when I started blogging after the end of the course I used the blog in, as it turns out the blogosphere isn’t as scary as it seems. I’ll be following along too!
May 18, 2007 at 9:48 pm
Thanks for your kind, welcoming words. I look forward to reading all your blogs in earnest!!
May 21, 2007 at 1:38 pm
I find the willingness to experience exposure the hardest part of blogging. I’m (always) working on overcoming that, not just because I want to be a “better blogger” (although, that would be nice) but because I think it might make me be better, stronger, smarter, *happier* person/colleague/friend/wife/mother/. . .
Thank you. This is wonderful!